Inside The Kitchen: Why “Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews” Matter Now
If you’re searching for Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, you’re not just looking for another Korean cooking show recap. You’re really asking: what was happening between those teammates when the cameras weren’t focused on the plates, but on the people? As a Korean who grew up with both school hierarchy and group projects as a daily reality, I can tell you that the most fascinating part of any “class” competition show is never only the food – it’s the social chemistry.
Culinary Class Wars, by concept, takes the familiar Korean “banjang–buteojang” (class president–vice president) style of group structure and drops it into a high-pressure kitchen. When fans look for Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, they want to understand why certain teams suddenly collapsed after a strong start, how quiet members ended up leading in crucial rounds, or why some pairings felt awkward even when they were winning. These are questions about Korean group culture, hierarchy, and face-saving, not just recipes.
In Korea, cooking variety shows are often edited to highlight conflict or heartwarming reconciliation, but the raw team interviews – especially the more candid, post-season sit-downs – reveal something much deeper: how age, school background, regional identity, and even military service experience subtly shaped each team’s communication style. When contestants later give exclusive interviews about their Season 2 team dynamics, they finally explain those small glances, half-jokes, and sudden mood shifts that international viewers noticed but couldn’t decode.
This is why the keyword Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews has become a kind of shortcut for fans who want “the real story.” They’re looking for long-form, behind-the-scenes explanations: who actually planned the menus, who took responsibility when things went wrong, which teams had off-camera arguments, and which rivalries were exaggerated in editing. For Korean viewers, these interviews are a mirror of our own school and workplace dynamics. For global viewers, they’re a crash course in how Korean team culture really works when it’s tested by time limits, harsh judges, and national TV.
In this guide, I’ll unpack Season 2’s team dynamics using the lens of those exclusive interviews – reconstructing patterns, cultural nuances, and unspoken rules that shaped every decision in that kitchen, from the first team challenge to the final service.
Key Takeaways From Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews
Before we dive deep, here are the core insights that fans usually search for when they look up Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews:
-
Hidden leaders vs. official captains
Exclusive interviews repeatedly reveal that the “announced” team leader and the actual decision-maker were often different people, especially in mixed-age teams. -
Age hierarchy quietly shaped communication
Even when producers emphasized “equality,” contestants admit in interviews that they filtered criticism based on age, using indirect language to avoid disrespect. -
Menu planning caused more conflict than cooking
Many Season 2 team dynamics interviews describe the real battlefield as the brainstorming phase, where taste, concept, and pride collided. -
Editing softened some of the toughest moments
Contestants often say in post-show interviews that certain arguments were cut or toned down, changing how viewers perceived specific team relationships. -
Regional and school ties created invisible alliances
In several exclusive interviews, members talk about subtle solidarity between people from the same province or similar school backgrounds, influencing how teams formed and supported each other. -
Growth arcs were real, not just scripted
Multiple Season 2 participants say that the “shy member becomes vocal” or “rivalry turns into respect” arcs genuinely developed over weeks of filming, not just through clever editing. -
Off-camera meals rebuilt broken teams
One of the most interesting recurring points in these interviews is how late-night convenience store runs or staff cafeteria meals often reset team tensions before major episodes. -
The show became a career turning point
Many Season 2 team members credit the intense dynamics – both conflicts and bonds – for shaping their later paths in culinary school, restaurants, or content creation.
How Korean Culture Shaped Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews
When we talk about Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, we’re really talking about how a very Korean style of group life collided with the global language of reality TV. To understand those interviews properly, you need to know the cultural background that every Korean viewer unconsciously brings to the show.
First, Korea’s education and workplace culture are built around collective identity. Group projects in Korean middle and high schools often assign a leader and distribute roles, but the unspoken rule is: don’t stand out too much, and don’t embarrass the group. Sociologists often describe Korean society as relatively collectivist compared to Western societies, a pattern also discussed in cross-cultural studies by organizations like Hofstede Insights. When contestants later give exclusive Season 2 team dynamics interviews, they frequently describe their biggest fear not as “losing,” but as “being the one who ruined it for everyone.”
Second, age hierarchy (seonbae–hubae or sunbae–hoobae) is crucial. In school, the difference of just one year creates a formal relationship with honorific speech and behavioral expectations. The National Institute of Korean Language explains how hierarchical speech levels work in daily life on its portal Korean.go.kr. In Season 2, when you see a younger member hesitate to contradict an older teammate during menu planning, that’s not just personality – it’s decades of social conditioning. In later interviews, many younger contestants admit they “held back” criticism or ideas to avoid seeming rude.
Third, cooking competitions in Korea carry a different emotional weight than in some Western contexts. Shows like MasterChef Korea (Mnet Plus) and Korean-style cooking variety programs have made viewers familiar with intense kitchen pressure, but Culinary Class Wars Season 2 adds the “class” concept, tapping into school nostalgia. The Korean Film Council’s statistics platform KOFIC shows how school-set dramas and films consistently perform well, reflecting this cultural attachment to classroom dynamics.
In exclusive Season 2 team dynamics interviews, you often hear contestants use school vocabulary: “banjeong” (class atmosphere), “team leader like homeroom teacher,” “I felt like the class troublemaker.” This isn’t accidental. The show’s design deliberately mirrors school life: group assignments, limited budgets, strict evaluation, and public ranking. The Ministry of Education’s reports on Korean school life (MOE) show how heavily ranked performance and peer evaluation shape students’ self-image, which then carries into adulthood and, in this case, into the kitchen.
Fourth, Korean broadcasting standards and image management culture affect what can be shown. Networks under the Korea Communications Standards Commission (KOCSC) are cautious about broadcasting overly aggressive conflict, bullying, or humiliation. So when contestants later share Season 2 team dynamics in exclusive interviews on YouTube channels, podcasts, or magazine pieces, they often reveal that certain tense moments were toned down or left out entirely to avoid controversy.
Finally, the boom of post-show interviews is itself part of Korea’s digital media shift. Platforms like Naver NOW (Naver NOW) and YouTube channels run by entertainment or food media increasingly invite eliminated contestants to “tell their side” in long-form conversations. This ecosystem encourages Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team members to speak more openly after the broadcast, giving global fans access (with subtitles) to nuanced explanations of their team dynamics.
So when you watch or read those Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, remember: behind every polite smile, indirect phrase, or carefully chosen word is a lifetime of Korean social training. Understanding that context is the key to decoding what they’re really saying about leadership, conflict, and respect in that high-pressure kitchen.
Reconstructing The Season: A Deep Dive Into Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews
Because official full transcripts of Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews are usually scattered across variety shows, YouTube channels, and written features, fans often piece together the real story from multiple sources. From a Korean perspective, several recurring narrative patterns emerge when you line up those Season 2 interviews.
One of the most consistent themes is the gap between “title leaders” and “functional leaders.” In many Season 2 teams, the oldest member or the most experienced cook was named leader at the start. But in interviews, teammates often reveal that menu creativity, plating decisions, or time management were actually driven by someone else – sometimes the quietest member. A typical pattern: the official leader handled external communication (talking to judges, representing the team), while an internally respected “planner” made the key calls during service.
Another key thread in Season 2 team dynamics interviews is the “menu conflict arc.” Contestants repeatedly describe the brainstorming phase as more stressful than the cooking itself. A common story: one member pushes a highly technical dish to impress judges, another argues for a simpler, home-style menu that fits the time limit, and a third worries about ingredient availability. In the show, this may appear as a short disagreement; in interviews, we learn it lasted hours and involved multiple compromises. Koreans watching those interviews immediately recognize this as a typical group project pattern: vision vs. practicality vs. resource constraints.
Communication style is another rich area that Season 2 team dynamics interviews unpack. Korean teams often use indirect criticism like “Maybe we could try another way?” instead of “This won’t work.” In post-show talk, contestants admit that they sometimes misread these soft phrases as agreement, leading to last-minute chaos. Several Season 2 members recount moments when they thought a teammate supported an idea, only to realize later that the person had been subtly signaling concern in a very Korean, face-saving way.
The emotional trajectory of teams across Season 2 also becomes clearer in exclusive interviews. In early episodes, many teams are polite, overly formal, and cautious. By mid-season, walls start to fall: honorifics become more casual, jokes get sharper, and conflicts become more honest. Contestants describe a turning point in their interviews – often after a particularly bad evaluation – when they decided to “stop being polite and start being real,” not in a Western reality TV sense of drama, but in a Korean sense of allowing more direct feedback while still preserving respect.
One particularly revealing pattern is how Season 2 contestants talk about “screen time consciousness.” Some members admit they avoided visible conflict because they were worried about being edited as the villain. Others say they felt pressure to be energetic or funny for the camera, which sometimes annoyed more serious teammates focused only on the food. These confessions in exclusive team dynamics interviews explain on-screen tensions that seemed minor but were actually rooted in different expectations about what it means to be on Korean TV.
Finally, Season 2 team dynamics interviews often end with reflections on regret and gratitude. Many contestants say they wish they had spoken up earlier, trusted a teammate more, or protected a quieter member from harsh criticism. Others express surprise at how much they grew socially, not just culinarily. For Korean viewers used to hierarchical, exam-focused environments, these reflections feel very familiar: they echo the way many of us look back on our own school group projects, remembering not only the grade, but the friendships and frictions that shaped us.
What Only Koreans Notice In Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews
When global fans watch subtitled Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, they catch the main story but often miss the micro-signals that Koreans immediately read. As a Korean viewer, here are the layers we tend to notice instinctively.
First, the speech levels. Even in informal interviews, you can hear who is older, who is younger, and who is trying to close or maintain distance. If a younger teammate continues to use very formal “-mnida/-seumnida” style while the older member switches to a more relaxed tone, it signals that the age hierarchy is still strong. In Season 2 interviews, when a younger contestant suddenly drops to a slightly more casual polite form, it often means their relationship has become more comfortable off-camera. Subtitles usually just say “Yeah” or “Okay,” but Koreans hear a relationship shift.
Second, the way blame is distributed in Season 2 team dynamics interviews is very Korean. You’ll often hear phrases like “It was everyone’s fault” or “We all made mistakes,” even when it’s clear one person burned the sauce or miscalculated cooking time. This is a typical Korean face-saving strategy: spreading responsibility to protect an individual’s dignity. When someone insists “I was the one who ruined it” and others immediately counter “No, no, it wasn’t just you,” that’s not just politeness – it’s a cultural ritual to prevent long-term resentment.
Third, body language around hierarchy is subtle but powerful. In many Season 2 exclusive interviews, you’ll see younger members slightly turn their shoulders toward the older teammate when discussing conflicts, signaling deference. Or a leader might gently tap a teammate’s arm while praising them, a common Korean way of softening compliments so they don’t feel too heavy. Global viewers might miss that when a junior member keeps their hands neatly on their lap and sits a bit straighter, they’re still in “respect mode,” even if they’re joking.
Fourth, Koreans pay close attention to apology styles. In Season 2 team dynamics interviews, a sincere “jeongmal mianhaesseo” (I was really sorry) delivered with a small bow of the head is a strong signal of genuine regret. When someone says “I should have done better as a leader,” it’s not just self-criticism; it’s also a way to reassert responsibility and restore trust. In Korean culture, leaders are expected to absorb more blame than they deserve. So when Season 2 captains repeatedly apologize in interviews, they’re fulfilling a social role as much as expressing personal feelings.
Fifth, there’s a uniquely Korean way of praising teammates indirectly. Instead of saying “I was great at time management,” a Season 2 contestant might say, “Thanks to our leader’s time checks, we could finish,” even if they themselves were the one constantly watching the clock. This humility is expected; bragging can be harshly judged online. Koreans reading between the lines often know who actually did what, especially if they cross-reference multiple interviews from the same team.
From an insider’s perspective, here are three practical “reading tips” for global fans when watching Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews:
Checklist for decoding Korean team interviews:
– Listen for shifts in speech level: sudden casualness usually means deeper trust.
– Watch who takes responsibility vs. who is protected: this reveals inner group loyalty.
– Notice who tells specific stories vs. who stays vague: detail often signals emotional investment or unresolved feelings.
These nuances make Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics interviews far richer than a simple “we fought, then we made up” narrative. They’re almost like a live lesson in Korean interpersonal etiquette under stress – and once you start noticing these layers, every rewatch feels completely different.
Comparing Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews To Other Shows And Their Wider Impact
To understand the impact of Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, it helps to compare them with similar Korean and global formats. The differences reveal why Season 2’s team stories resonated so strongly with both Korean and international audiences.
In many Western cooking competitions, post-show interviews emphasize individual journeys: “my restaurant,” “my dream,” “my signature dish.” In contrast, Season 2 interviews consistently circle back to “our team,” “our menu,” “our atmosphere.” Even contestants who later pursue solo careers often describe Season 2 as a lesson in collaboration rather than a showcase of personal talent. This emphasis on group identity is distinctively Korean and sets Culinary Class Wars apart from formats like MasterChef or Chopped.
If we compare Season 2’s team dynamics interviews to other Korean team-based programs (like idol survival shows or school-themed reality), we see a different tone. Idol survival show interviews often highlight competition within the group for debut spots, while Season 2 interviews highlight mutual protection – sharing credit, absorbing blame, and emphasizing unity under pressure. This positions Culinary Class Wars Season 2 as closer to a “classroom drama” in reality form than a cutthroat survival contest.
Here’s a simplified comparison table to frame this:
| Aspect | Culinary Class Wars S2 Team Dynamics Interviews | Typical Korean Survival/Competition Shows |
|---|---|---|
| Main focus in interviews | Group process, communication, shared responsibility | Individual ranking, personal hardship |
| Conflict framing | “We misunderstood each other, we grew” | “I had to survive, I had to stand out” |
| Leadership narrative | Leaders as protectors who absorb blame | Leaders as top performers or center figures |
| Emotional takeaway | Nostalgia for class/group life, bittersweet teamwork memories | Triumph/defeat arc, personal resilience |
The global impact of Season 2 team dynamics interviews also shows up in fan behavior. International viewers increasingly seek out raw Korean interviews with subtitles rather than relying only on the edited show. This mirrors a broader trend where global K-content fans want “behind-the-edit” truth. Platforms that host these interviews see active comment sections where non-Korean viewers discuss hierarchy, communication styles, and emotional intelligence, often comparing them with their own cultures.
Another important impact is on how future contestants approach Korean team shows. After Season 2’s interviews circulated, aspiring participants on similar programs began talking more openly (on social media and pre-show content) about their worries regarding team conflicts, leadership roles, and age gaps. Season 2 essentially set a template: it showed that audiences are not only interested in who wins, but in how the team functioned at each step.
From an industry perspective, production teams likely took note of how much engagement these Season 2 team dynamics interviews generated. When you see later shows offering structured “post-season roundtable” specials, it’s partly because Season 2 proved that long-form, candid team discussions can extend a show’s life beyond the final episode and create deeper emotional attachment.
Finally, on a cultural level, Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews contributed to an ongoing conversation in Korea about healthy communication, workplace hierarchy, and the cost of excessive politeness. Viewers on Korean forums and portals like Naver and Daum debated whether certain Season 2 teams would have performed better if juniors had spoken more frankly, or if leaders had been less self-sacrificing. In that sense, Season 2’s interviews didn’t just entertain; they nudged public reflection on how we work and live together in groups.
Why Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Interviews Matter In Korean Society
Within Korean culture, Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews are more than fandom content; they’re informal case studies of how a generation handles pressure, hierarchy, and collaboration. Many Koreans watch these interviews and immediately relate them to their own realities in schools, offices, and even family gatherings.
One major reason these Season 2 interviews matter is that they gently challenge the traditional idea that harmony (hwa) must always be preserved, even at the cost of honesty. In several interviews, contestants admit that avoiding small conflicts early on led to bigger problems later: unspoken resentment, misaligned expectations, or last-minute breakdowns in the kitchen. This resonates with a broader social debate in Korea about the need for more direct but respectful communication, especially in workplaces where younger employees (MZ generation) push back against unquestioned hierarchy.
At the same time, Season 2 team dynamics interviews reinforce certain positive aspects of Korean collectivism. When teammates talk about staying up late to practice together, sharing ingredients, or covering for each other’s weaknesses, they highlight values like jeong (deep, often unspoken affection and loyalty) and gongdongche (sense of shared community). These are cultural concepts that sociologists and cultural critics frequently discuss in the context of Korean society’s rapid modernization, as seen in analyses from institutions like the Korean Culture and Information Service.
Another layer of significance lies in how these interviews humanize competition. Korea is known for intense academic and professional competition, and cooking shows can easily become another arena for ruthless performance. But Season 2’s team interviews repeatedly show contestants prioritizing emotional safety over victory – checking in on a stressed teammate, choosing not to assign public blame, or accepting a risky menu to support someone’s creative vision. For many Korean viewers exhausted by zero-sum narratives, this felt quietly radical.
Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews also function as informal mentorship content. Culinary students, aspiring chefs, and even office workers watch these conversations to pick up strategies: how to disagree respectfully with a senior, how to lead without bullying, how to apologize without losing authority. In a society where formal leadership training is still developing in many fields, reality show case studies like this become surprisingly influential.
Finally, these Season 2 interviews contribute to Korea’s ongoing self-reflection about media representation. As more contestants use post-show platforms to clarify edited narratives, viewers become more media literate, questioning what they see on screen and seeking fuller context. This aligns with a growing emphasis on critical media education in Korea, supported by bodies like the Korea Communications Standards Commission and the Korean Media Rating Board.
In short, Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews matter because they sit at the intersection of entertainment, social psychology, and cultural change. They turn a cooking classroom into a mirror, reflecting how Koreans negotiate respect, ambition, and empathy when the clock is ticking and the whole country is watching.
FAQ: Common Questions About Culinary Class Wars Season 2 Team Dynamics Exclusive Interviews
1. Why are Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews so different from what we see in the episodes?
Season 2 episodes are edited for pacing, story arcs, and broadcast standards, while the team dynamics exclusive interviews are usually long-form, minimally edited conversations. In the episodes, you mostly see peak moments: time pressure, judge reactions, quick snapshots of disagreements. The goal is to keep tension high and the narrative clear. But in Season 2 exclusive interviews, contestants have time to walk through what actually happened: how an argument built up over several days, how a menu idea evolved, or how a team repaired trust after a failure.
From a Korean perspective, another big difference is the level of emotional expression. On the show, many contestants hold back tears or strong words because they’re conscious of national TV and their families watching. In later Season 2 team dynamics interviews – often recorded in smaller studios or casual settings – they feel safer to admit things like “I was really hurt by that comment” or “I actually wanted to quit that day.” This aligns with a broader pattern in Korean media where variety shows present a controlled image, and follow-up content reveals the rawer truth.
So if you felt some Season 2 team relationships seemed confusing or abruptly resolved on air, the exclusive interviews are where the missing emotional and chronological details finally appear.
2. How much did age and hierarchy really affect Season 2 team dynamics, according to the interviews?
In Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, age and hierarchy come up constantly, even when contestants try to downplay it. Younger members often confess they hesitated to criticize older teammates, especially in front of cameras. They describe rephrasing direct feedback into softer suggestions, like “Maybe we could also consider…” instead of “This won’t work.” Older contestants, in turn, sometimes admit they misread that politeness as agreement, only realizing later that juniors had serious concerns.
In Korean culture, as documented in many sociolinguistic studies and explained by institutions like the National Institute of Korean Language (Korean.go.kr), speaking too bluntly to a senior can be seen as disrespectful. Season 2 interviews show how this played out under time pressure: juniors silently fixing problems rather than pointing them out, or seniors overcompensating by taking on too much work to avoid seeming lazy.
Interestingly, some Season 2 teams describe a turning point when they explicitly decided to “ignore age for the sake of the kitchen.” After that, interviews reveal more direct communication and better results. This mix of traditional respect and emerging equality makes the Season 2 team dynamics interviews a fascinating snapshot of generational change in Korea.
3. Were any rivalries or conflicts in Season 2 exaggerated or downplayed, based on the exclusive interviews?
According to many Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews, both things happened: some tensions were softened in editing, while others were highlighted for drama. Contestants often clarify that what looked like a huge fight on screen was actually a short, intense disagreement followed by a calm, off-camera resolution. Because of broadcast time limits and content standards from bodies like the Korea Communications Standards Commission (KOCSC), prolonged arguments or harsh language are often cut or trimmed.
On the other hand, certain rivalries between teams can be framed more sharply in the episodes through music, reaction shots, and selective quotes. In Season 2 interviews, participants sometimes laugh and say, “We actually liked each other, but the edit made it look like we were enemies.” They then share behind-the-scenes stories of sharing ingredients, giving each other advice, or eating together after filming – moments that rarely make it into the main broadcast.
For fans, this is why Season 2 team dynamics interviews are so important: they allow you to recalibrate your impressions, distinguishing between narrative framing and real interpersonal history. Koreans are increasingly aware of this gap, which is why many viewers now wait for these interviews before forming strong opinions about any contestant.
4. How can international fans better understand the nuances in Season 2 team dynamics interviews without knowing Korean?
Even if you don’t speak Korean, there are several strategies to get more out of Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews. First, watch multiple interviews from the same team if possible – for example, one on a TV talk show, one on a YouTube channel, and one written feature. Different platforms encourage different levels of honesty; patterns that repeat across them are likely close to the truth.
Second, pay attention to non-verbal cues: who looks at whom when answering, who laughs nervously, who nods vigorously in agreement. In Korean culture, avoiding eye contact while apologizing can signal genuine shame, while consistent eye contact with a small smile during praise often shows real affection and respect.
Third, if subtitles are available, notice phrases like “I was lacking” or “I should have done better.” These are culturally loaded expressions of self-criticism that often mask deeper emotions. When multiple Season 2 teammates all use similar self-blaming language, it’s usually a sign of collective guilt-sharing, a common Korean way to preserve harmony.
Finally, consider following Korean fans’ discussions on platforms like Reddit or Twitter, where bilingual users often explain specific jokes, honorific nuances, or cultural references from Season 2 interviews. This community translation layer can dramatically deepen your understanding of the team dynamics.
5. Did Culinary Class Wars Season 2 team dynamics interviews have any effect on the contestants’ later careers or public image?
Yes, Season 2 team dynamics exclusive interviews played a significant role in shaping how contestants were perceived long-term. In some cases, participants who seemed cold or overly strict in the main episodes gained sympathy after explaining in interviews that they felt crushing responsibility as leaders or were editing themselves to avoid saying something hurtful. Viewers began to see them less as “villains” and more as stressed perfectionists navigating a tough cultural balancing act.
For others, the interviews highlighted their emotional intelligence and teamwork skills, leading to opportunities beyond pure cooking. Some Season 2 alumni were later invited to appear on talk shows, web variety programs, or brand campaigns precisely because their interview presence was warm, reflective, and relatable. Korean entertainment and advertising increasingly value this kind of “sincerity image,” especially in a media environment where authenticity is prized.
From a career standpoint, Season 2 team dynamics interviews also allowed contestants to clarify their culinary philosophy and leadership style. Restaurant owners, culinary schools, and content producers watch these interviews to gauge not only skill, but also how someone might fit into a team or brand. In that sense, these interviews became unofficial job interviews broadcast to the whole industry.
Related Links Collection
Hofstede Insights – Country comparison (collectivism/individualism)
National Institute of Korean Language – Korean language and honorifics
Korean Film Council (KOFIC) – Korean content and audience trends
Ministry of Education – Reports on Korean school culture
Korea Communications Standards Commission – Broadcast standards
Naver NOW – Korean digital talk/interview platform
Korean Culture and Information Service – Korean cultural background
Korean Media Rating Board – Media environment in Korea